Meaningful progress or empty promises? An analysis of how gender features in NCD action plans
This analysis examines how gender is considered in integrated national non-communicable disease (NCD) plans, following repeated global commitments to adopt gender-based approaches since the first UN High-Level Meeting on NCDs in 2011.
Reviewing 65 integrated NCD plans covering 89 countries, the study assesses the inclusion of gender across four policy domains: objectives, strategies, monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and budgeting.
Key findings:
- Only 1 plan (2%) is gender-transformative
- 11 plans (17%) are gender-responsive
- 39 plans (60%) are gender-targeted
- 14 plans (21%) are gender-blind
- 0 plans include gender-transformative objectives or budgets
- 3 plans include gender in M&E but lack strategies
- 3 plans budget nothing for gendered actions despite having gender-focused objectives
The findings highlight a significant gap between political commitments and policy.
As the 2025 UN High-Level Meeting on NCDs approaches, the report calls for concrete action to integrate a gender perspective into NCD planning and implementation.
Related Content
Full discussion: Gender in NCD Action Plans – meaningful progress or empty promises?
Date published: Node Type: video
Meaningful progress or empty promises? An analysis of how gender features in NCD action plans
Date published: Node Type: event
The George Institute’s Response to the Zero Draft on NCDs and Mental Health
Date published: Node Type: policy practice report
Priorities for the UN High-Level Meeting on Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) 2025
Date published: Node Type: policy practice report

