TY - JOUR AU - Levin A. AU - Jha V. AU - Delmonico F. AU - Martin D. AU - Dominguez-Gil B. AU - Muller E. AU - Danovitch G. AU - Capron A. AB -

The supply of organs-particularly kidneys-donated by living and deceased donors falls short of the number of patients added annually to transplant waiting lists in the United States. To remedy this problem, a number of prominent physicians, ethicists, economists and others have mounted a campaign to suspend the prohibitions in the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 (NOTA) on the buying and selling of organs. The argument that providing financial benefits would incentivize enough people to part with a kidney (or a portion of a liver) to clear the waiting lists is flawed. This commentary marshals arguments against the claim that the shortage of donor organs would best be overcome by providing financial incentives for donation. We can increase the number of organs available for transplantation by removing all financial disincentives that deter unpaid living or deceased kidney donation. These disincentives include a range of burdens, such as the costs of travel and lodging for medical evaluation and surgery, lost wages, and the expense of dependent care during the period of organ removal and recuperation. Organ donation should remain an act that is financially neutral for donors, neither imposing financial burdens nor enriching them monetarily.

AD - New England Organ Bank, Boston, MA. AN - 25833381 BT - American Journal of Transplantation DA - -45540646451 DP - NLM ET - 2015/04/03 LA - eng LB - INDIA
UK
FY16 M1 - 5 N1 - Delmonico, F L
Martin, D
Dominguez-Gil, B
Muller, E
Jha, V
Levin, A
Danovitch, G M
Capron, A M
United States
Am J Transplant. 2015 May;15(5):1187-91. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13232. Epub 2015 Mar 31. N2 -

The supply of organs-particularly kidneys-donated by living and deceased donors falls short of the number of patients added annually to transplant waiting lists in the United States. To remedy this problem, a number of prominent physicians, ethicists, economists and others have mounted a campaign to suspend the prohibitions in the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 (NOTA) on the buying and selling of organs. The argument that providing financial benefits would incentivize enough people to part with a kidney (or a portion of a liver) to clear the waiting lists is flawed. This commentary marshals arguments against the claim that the shortage of donor organs would best be overcome by providing financial incentives for donation. We can increase the number of organs available for transplantation by removing all financial disincentives that deter unpaid living or deceased kidney donation. These disincentives include a range of burdens, such as the costs of travel and lodging for medical evaluation and surgery, lost wages, and the expense of dependent care during the period of organ removal and recuperation. Organ donation should remain an act that is financially neutral for donors, neither imposing financial burdens nor enriching them monetarily.

PY - 2015 SN - 1600-6143 (Electronic)
1600-6135 (Linking) SP - 1187 EP - 91 T2 - American Journal of Transplantation TI - Living and deceased organ donation should be financially neutral acts VL - 15 Y2 - FY16 ER -