01679nas a2200193 4500000000100000008004100001260001600042653002400058653001200082100001600094700001600110700001700126700001800143245012000161300003500281490000700316050000600323520115600329 2005 d c5424252540010aPeer Reviewed Paper10aChecked1 aFerreira P.1 aHerbert Rob1 aLatimer Jane1 ade Freitas A.00aSearching the LILACS database for Portuguese- and Spanish-language randomized trials in physiotherapy was difficult a233-237. [Impact Factor 2.565]0 v58 aN3 a

OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based practice requires access to systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials; however, most literature databases index primarily English-language journals. We sought to determine the extent and quality of Portuguese- and Spanish-language reports of randomized trials relevant to physiotherapy by searching the LILACS database (Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciencias da Saude). A secondary aim was to compare the sensitivity of three strategies for searching for Portuguese- and Spanish-language randomized trials in physiotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The LILACS database was searched for randomized trials using three search strategies. RESULTS: Three search strategies returned 5,262 records, of which only 47 were randomized trials. Most trials reported treatments for pain or cardiopulmonary disease, and most were of moderate to high quality. The sensitivity of the three search strategies varied from 2% to 53%. CONCLUSION: A small number of moderate- to high-quality randomized trials in physiotherapy are published in Spanish and Portuguese languages, but they are difficult to find.