@article{16643,
  author = {Shiwa S. and C. Lda Costa and Junior L. and Venancio R. and Ruggero C. and O. Tde Sato and Lopes A. and Costa Leonardo and Moseley A.},
  title = {Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale},
  abstract = {<p>
The objective of this study was to test the inter-rater reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale. Seven physiotherapists rated the methodological quality of 50 reports of randomized controlled trials written in Portuguese indexed on the PEDro database. Each report was also rated using the English version of the PEDro Scale. Reproducibility was evaluated by comparing two separate ratings of reports written in Portuguese and comparing the Portuguese PEDro score with the English version of the scale. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.53 to 1.00 for individual item and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82 for the total PEDro score was observed. The standard error of the measurement of the scale was 0.58. The Portuguese version of the scale was comparable with the English version, with an ICC of 0.78. The inter-rater reproducibility of the Brazilian Portuguese PEDro Scale is adequate and similar to the original English version.
</p>
},
  year = {2011},
  journal = {Cadernos de Saude Publica},
  volume = {27},
  edition = {2011/10/28},
  number = {10},
  pages = {2063-8},
  month = {229478235459},
  isbn = {1678-4464 (Electronic)0102-311X (Linking)},
  note = {Shiwa, Silvia ReginaCosta, Leonardo Oliveira PenaCosta, Luciola da Cunha MenezesMoseley, AnneHespanhol Junior, Luiz CarlosVenancio, RobertaRuggero, CintiaSato, Tatiana de OliveiraLopes, Alexandre DiasBrazilCadernos de saude publica / Ministerio da Saude, Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Saude PublicaCad Saude Publica. 2011 Oct;27(10):2063-8.},
  language = {eng},
}